Home | Friday 24th October 2008 | Issue 652
DEFRA-NATELY MAYBE
Just in case you were in any doubt, starting to think, ‘hang on, why do we spend our time risking arrest and assault in futile actions against war, oppression and animal abuse?' and considering hanging up the balaclava - well, think again... There's been a hearty thumbs up for the power of direct action from, of all places, the Department of Environment, Fisheries and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), who said last week that the decision not to sanction a mass killing/cull of badgers in England (see SchNEWS 610) was all down to the threat of direct action from animal rights protesters.
In government-speak, Hilary Benn (DEFRA secretary) stated that their decision was based on ‘the likelihood that public order problems’ could jeopardise the slaughter, ‘in the face of the total lack of public acceptability of a badger cull.’
So there you have it. Straight from the horse’s mouth. If it was just ‘unacceptable to the public’ the Man would have gone ahead and committed badgercide anyway...
* See www.badgertrust.org.uk