About Us
Back Issues
The free weekly direct action newsheet published in Brighton since 1994 - Copyleft - Information for Action

Police Siren?

as the CACC sticks to the gates of Buckingham Palace

It has been a rather bumpy road for the Climate Siren brand over the last few months. Beginning as a somewhat strange one page anonymous call-out on a previously unheard of website, it raised the suspicions of activists from the start, even getting in the Guardian denying that it was a police honey trap.

What we got to witness however was a bit of pro-royalist direct action begging the Queen to share her son's interest in the environment.

At 2pm on Saturday 4 people approached the gates of Buckingham Palace, climbed them and hung banners with slogans including a recent quote from Prince Charles. Surprisingly both SO14 (Royal Protection) and the Scots Guards on duty were more restrained than might be expected and no shots were fired. The small number of supporters present no doubt had something to do with the “are they or aren't they spies?” controversy. The four climbers were eventually arrested several hours later after a cherry-picker was brought to the scene. One of those arrested was Phil Thornhill the leader of the one man band that is the Campaign against Climate Change (CaCC), which is best known for its relentless organising (in the face of persistent institutional indifference) of an A to B marches through London every year to coincide with the UN climate talks. Whether the decade of being politely ignored by politicians has taken its toll and caused him to snap we have been unable to ascertain but one suspects he will find that Her Majesty can politely ignore people with the best of them.

The collapse of the climate movement since Copenhagen has certainly left a huge hole that needs filling but the adoption of such tactics by those without any radical message is rather incongruous to say the least. One wonders if some of the remnants of Climate Camp are at present huddled in a darkened rooms discussing taking up armed struggle just to distance themselves from such an embarrassing display of direct-action royal fawning.

Unfortunately we're still not much wiser as to the nature and motivations of the Climate Siren entity (we hesitate to use the word group). A review of what we do know might allow readers to make their own judgements.

Climate-Siren.com called out for "a great effort of civil disobedience" – in particular on 23rd June, the day after the Rio+20 Summit ends (full name Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development). To facilitate this action the website asks for readers to supply their e-mail address or mobile phone number so they can be contacted nearer the time. Climate activists smelled something fishy going on. Nobody seemed to have heard of the group, and no indication is given on the website of what groups or individuals are behind the site. The front and only page consists of vague text with no real targets, aims or methods of action mentioned. If this were all that there was to the story this could be explained by naïve optimism – i.e. the site's author hoping that activists would supply details to someone that they do not know and that they would turn up to an action which they know nothing about. As it turns out, this is just the tip of the iceberg.



The name and address of the person registering the domain are given as Nick Bennett, a Conservative Party County Councillor for the Alfriston, East Hoathly and Hellingly division in East Sussex. The same Nick Bennett was also a chief superintendent with Sussex Police until a few years ago.

Dodgy as it sounds, the story gets dodgier still – a story published in the Guardian on 13th June claimed that the domain had been setup in the "Tory councillor's name without his knowledge" and that it had "been reported to the police by a Conservative councillor after he learned that his personal details had been used to register the website's domain name". Bizarrely the registration details have since been changed to that of Leo Hickman the Guardian journalist who wrote the story. However SchNEWS can confirm that these denials in the press only appeared after questions were asked about the registration of the website within the activist community. This does raise the question of how Nick Bennett found out that his details had been "misused" without paranoidly checking to see if someone has registered a website in your name, how would you ever know?

So who exactly is Nick Bennett and how likely is it that he has nothing to do with the website? Interestingly one of the interests he declared as a county councillor was that he is employed by Naylor & Osborn Ltd. Naylor & Osborn are a private security company headquartered in Croydon whose namesakes have some quite interesting backgrounds. Robert Naylor (Managing Director) is an ex-Metropolitan Police inspector and Nick Osborn (Operations Director) is currently studying for a PhD at Portsmouth University, researching the "National Intelligence Model and its application". While the public face of Naylor & Osborn is RNA Training, the name they trade under to teach "investigation skills, managing investigators and counter terrorism awareness" it seems entirely possible that they also actively engage in using the skills they teach, particularly "intelligence-led investigation and analysis". The fact that the hosting company for the website in Malaysia is a multinational that appears to only advertise to corporate clients and heavily touts its "network security and monitoring" services doesn't inspire much confidence either.

Even if the people behind Climate Siren are genuine, they do provide an example of precisely how not to organise an action. Activism is if nothing else founded on trust and while anonymous callouts using social media might potentially have some uses, in most cases if the trust ain’t there how can people expect to organise? Even if the Climate Siren case has some innocent explanation the way that it has been organised shows such poor judgement that it is unlikely to build trust in the future. The whole incident is also a reminder that whatever the exact nature of this case the threat of infiltration by police or private security companies has far from receded. In fact in the present Jubilee/Olympics period (with who knows how much money sloshing around for private security companies to play with) people need to be even more vigilant while at the same time not allowing such tactics to stifle much needed resistance.

There are 6 comments on this story...
Added By: Astonished of South London - 26th June 2012 @ 11:21 AM
OK, so a group suspected of not being genuine does a direct action at Buckingham Palace and one of the people involved is a well known climate activist.

Yet, the article states: "Even if the people behind Climate Siren are genuine"


It's worth remembering that all groups have to start somewhere, and we were all a "first timer" once to a demo or meeting of our favoured campaign group.

Sounds like someone at SchNEWS is either jealous of the kind of media coverage that most actions can only dream of, or has a massive grudge for some reason or another.

It's starting to sound like a nutty conspiracy theory rag at best, and an anonymous hate propaganda tool at worst.
Added By: Anonymous - 26th June 2012 @ 8:54 PM
Sorry have I stumbled into a Viz ..sorry I mean Class War meeting ?
Added By: Anonymous - 28th June 2012 @ 5:23 PM
Shock Horror! ... Activists sceptical of weird pro-monarchist protest with suspicious links to dodgy world of private security companies. Who would have thought it!

In other news Tony Blair d-locks himself to White House fence to promote the 'divine right of kings'.

Added By: Phil Thornhill - 29th June 2012 @ 10:51 AM
Added By: Anonymous - 29th June 2012 @ 12:50 PM
@Phil Thornhill

Phil, I don't quite understand your comments about the registering of the website.
Are you saying that you actually set up the website but used Nick Bennetts name and then subsequently changed it to the name of the Guardian journalist?
If so, Why?
Added By: Mira - 26th February 2013 @ 8:21 PM
Hello Sammy, the answer is No' as cotmuper viruses and other malicious program spread from cotmuper to cotmuper by either downloading, opening, and installing programs that has the viruses, worms, trojan horses, etc. I am networking in my home with 2 other cotmupers, one is a laptop and the others are desktops, one of the desktop cotmuper one had a serious virus where it had to be taken to the shop to get it removed twice, while the laptop and the other desktop had no problems. You each has its own antivirus program installed and 2 with a store bought antivirus program and one with the Free version, it were the free version that got infected, not saying that it were because of the free version because the one that is installed is real good, but it were Not' keep updated with the latest updates or scan often. So to make a long story even longer (smile) As long as you don't download, install or open any programs that you don't know about or who it came from and keep each cotmuper up-to-date with the latest updates and run a full scan at least once a week then no matter how many cotmuper you run in a single house and are networking together they will be protected.
Stories about similar subjects...

Anti-nuclear protests in Japan as plants fired up again

The Black Fish release hundreds of captive bluefin tuna into the Adriatic Sea.

Anger as French police refuse to investigate tragic death of Sudanese man in Calais.

European Parliament rejects The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)

Anti-Fracking Protesters on Trial in Preston

Activists began a project of land reclamation in Runnymeade

Judge rules in favour of Sea Shepherd, the international non-profit Marine Wildlife Conservation Organisation, during a trial in a UK court after a lawsuit filed by Fish and Fish, a Maltese tuna company.

Green economy? Fat chance at the Rio+20 Summit

Twitter: @SchNEWS