CAGE
THE RAGE
INTERNMENT IS NEW TACTIC TO DEAL WITH ANIMAL
RIGHTS MOVEMENT
“This is just the latest example
of the state attempting to decapitate the animal rights movement – but we’re
not going away” - SPEAK campaigner.
“What
people outside the animal rights movement don’t seem to appreciate is that
once these moves have been practised on us, they are expanded to everyone expressing
dissent – just look at how PHA injunctions attacked first us, then the peace
movement, then the environmentalists and finally the climate camp”
- an Animal Rights Legal Advisor
The screws have been tightened
on the animal rights (AR) movement yet again. In this country, and in the US,
there has been a serious state attempt to deal with the strength of the animal
rights movement by using an extra-legal form of internment. Currently the three
most prominent activists from the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC)
campaign - Greg Avery, Natasha Avery and Heather Nicholson - are all on remand,
after high profile arrests back on May 1st (see SchNEWS
585). They are charged with ‘conspiracy to blackmail’. Now the
same applies to the main spokesman for the SPEAK campaign, Mel Broughton.
Mel was arrested in his home at 5.30am on December 12th – and he’s
been held on remand ever since on charges of arson and ‘conspiracy to blackmail’.
Meanwhile campaigners against the Sequani animal labs in Ledbury are on trial
for conspiracy to breach Sections 145 and 146 of the SOCPA – laws especially
introduced to protect ‘animal research’ facilities.
SPEAK (www.speakcampaigns.org)
are fighting against the new Oxford University primate laboratory, referred to
as being of ‘national importance’ by Lord Sainsbury, unelected science
minister and aggressive lobbyist for GM crops amongst other profitable er, sorry,
progressive issues. Back in June, SchNEWS reported how a senior Thames Valley
police officer, Inspector Shead, was caught on tape promising to ‘wage a
dirty war’ against the SPEAK campaign (see SchNEWS
590) and ‘persecute’ spokesman Mel Broughton - indeed ‘to
prosecute the sh*t out of him’. Now the meaning of that has become clear
- the shattering of the AR movement by any means necessary. A SPEAK campaigner
told us, “We know they’ve been gunning for Mel for a long time –
but this isn’t a one man campaign. It is basically internment – everything
about this campaign is peaceful and legal. The big picture is that the police
want to smash SPEAK and SHAC.’’
Aspects of the raids, taken
in context with other repression around the country, demonstrate that the police’s
main strategy is disruption. During Operation Achilles – the raids which
netted the SHAC organisers - huge quantities of leaflets, cash etc was seized
as ‘evidence’, obviously damaging the ability of the campaign to continue.
One campaigner arrested during the initial sweep told SchNEWS how the police pressured
them to try and secure their Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) key to their computers.
In November, police wrote letters demanding that the passwords for encrypted files
on seized computers be released under threat of legal action. Campaigners refused
to back down and as yet no legal action has been taken.
LOVE SHAC
The reason the state is using conspiracy charges is they like their all encompassing
vagueness. Rather than having to prove specific criminal activities, a huge quantity
of evidence can be produced from which ‘inferences’ can be drawn.
In the SHAC case over 15,000 pages of documents have been produced, including
transcripts from bugs placed in hire cars and into the wall of, what the prosecution
are referring to as, ‘the SHAC house’.
Also included are transcripts
of conversations made by one of the accused from prison. However there is not
one shred of evidence that points to direct engagement in criminal activities
(beyond such trivia as trespass). According to one source, the evidence is bizarre
- “it includes family photos – loads of stuff that hasn’t got
anything to do with animal rights or demos or anything...”
The trial
is expected to last six months - so even if the three are acquitted they will
have spent the best part of two years unable to take part in any effective campaigning.
If they are convicted it will pave the way to repeat the tactics with other campaign
groups - except those couched in the vaguest non-threatening terms - and especially
those that are actually effective.
“The danger of this sort of accusation
is that simply running a campaign could be described as blackmail. Obviously a
blackmailer’s threats do not have to be illegal, simply the suggestion that
if you don’t do X we will do Y could be construed as blackmail” (AR
legal advisor) - i.e. the very act of organising demos could become a very serious
criminal offence, punishable by years inside. So once more we see laws drafted
to protect individuals being used (or twisted) to protect corporations. SHAC has
to be the legally most watertight campaign in the UK. Everything they publish
is checked by a barrister beforehand. As our source told us, “ They’ve
got masses of evidence of demos being organised of course but most of them are
organised with the police! Every campaign has a target – even Greenpeace
send out action e-mail alerts! How can what we do be described as blackmail?”
The case of the Sequani Six is now entering its second week in Birmingham Crown
Court. Sequani are a vivisection laboratory based in Ledbury, Herefordshire and
are the latest beneficiaries of a law specifically targeted at those who campaign
for animal rights. Six protesters, including one 80-year-old woman are charged
with conspiracy to “interfere with contractual relationships so as to harm
animal research organisation” under section 145 of SOCPA.
To add
insult to injury the judge in the trial has admitted that he regularly enjoys
hunting – but we’re sure he won’t let that unduly prejudice
him.
It has been suggested by top cop Anton Setchell (ACPO National Coordinator
for Domestic Extremism) that the SOCPA laws, which effectively prohibit demos
outside establishments connected with animal research, were not drafted widely
enough. He wants them expanded to cover any groups that engage in sustained campaigning.
The National Extremism Tactical Co-ordinating Unit’s website (www.netcu.org.uk)
says, “The term ‘domestic extremism’ applies to unlawful action
that is part of a protest or campaign. It is most often associated with ‘single-issue’
protests, such as animal rights, anti-war, anti-globalisation and anti-GM (genetically
modified) crops.”. Alarmingly section 149 of SOCPA allows the secretary
of state to declare any business to be the equivalent of an animal research establishment
without going back to Parliament.
Despite the full agencies of the state
being bent on the movement’s destruction, with widespread abuse of public
order law and the shutting down of animal rights info stalls – they’re
not going away! Demos continue despite police intimidation. Vivisectors and those
who deal with them are still firmly in the movement’s sights and a glance
at the websites demonstrate the extent to which this struggle is still gaining
in strength, and going global. As a SHAC activist told us “They think that
by taking out a few key people they can stop our movement but for every two they
take away there will be four to take their place. The public support has been
amazing...”
* SPEAK www.speakcampaigns.org
* SHAC www.shac.net
* STOPSequani www.stopsequani.co.uk
CRAP
ARREST OF THE WEEK
For watching a demonstration...
Living in Parliament Square as he does, Brian Haw has little say on who pops round
to hang out in his back garden, so to speak. Last weekend SOCPA-fighting activists
and civil liberty campaigners took part in a national day of action (which saw
protests in Milton Keynes, Cambridge, Liverpool, Oxforf, Aberystwyth and the Aldermaston
Atomic Weapons Establishment - for more details see www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/01/389354.html),
ending up with a demo outside Parliament. As an interested onlooker, Brian decided
to video the event.
Bully boy cops were obviously upset at this clear
breach of their freedom to illegally repress and attack protesters without fear
of being filmed in the act. One officer bashed Brian’s camera so hard it
gashed open his cheek Brian barely had time to cry out an expletive in anguish
before he was arrested for threatening words and/or behaviour, and dragged him
off to a police van where he was assaulted by a number of London’s finest,
getting punched in the testicles for good measure.
After being later bailed
for a month on unspecified charges, Brian said “I wouldn’t call it
an arrest, I’d call it a kidnap.” Currently nursing his wounds, cut,
bruises and a swollen wrist injury, he plans to make an official complaint against
his treatment.
He might not be the only one – his friend, Steve Jago,
who attempted to intervene was also arrested and assaulted. The heavy-handed approach
was also extended to the demonstrators as a 61-year-old women was thrown roughly
to the ground and an elderly man knocked off his bicycle. Up to seven others were
arrested for the violent, state-threatening action of lying down on the pavement.
The consultation on reforming SOCPA has now closed (see SchNEWS 612) so expect
the bill to soon be ‘harmonised’ and treatment like this to rolled
out all over the country...
* See: www.parliament-square.org.uk
and www.repeal-socpa.info
STOP
BLUBBERING!
Illegal Japanese whaling activity has been brought to
the world’s attention this week with the kidnapping on Tuesday night (15th)
of two activists from the Sea Shepherd anti-whaling vessel the Steve Irwin. Benjamin
Potts and Giles Lane boarded a Japanese whaling ship to protest against the cruel
and illegal activity and quickly found themselves in captivity.
They were
there to deliver a letter reminding the whalers that they were in violation of
international conservation law by targeting endangered species in an established
whale sanctuary. No doubt embarrassed by the impending bad publicity - like the
50-strong protest outside the London embassy on Wednesday - the Japanese government
quickly agreed to ensure that the activists were handed back, even as they condemned
the action saying that the hunting ship Yushin Maru had done nothing wrong. Despite
this they did released the two into the care of an Australian Customs ship on
Thursday. Ben and Giles now plan to return to the Steve Irwin and continue the
fight as soon as possible.
According to the Oxford English dictionary,
a hostage is “a person seized or held in order to induce others to comply
with a demand or condition” - something that’s generally accepted
as being against the law. Shortly after Benjamin and Giles boarded the Yushin,
the euphemistically entitled Institute of Cetacean Research contacted the Sea
Shepherd Conservation Society (who run the Steve Irwin) demanding they stop all
protest activity – if they agreed, then they could have their activists
back. “They are acting like a terrorist organization,” said Steve
Irwin’s 1st Officer Peter Brown. “Here they are taking hostages and
making demands. Our policy is that we don’t respond to terrorist demands.”
Instead they continue to disrupt the hunt for endangered whales in the Southern
Oceans Whale Sanctuary, where their presence, and that of Greenpeace, has ensured
no whales have been killed since January 11th.
This is not helping the
Japanese with their plan to kill 935 minke whales and 50 fin whales in the Southern
Ocean this summer for er, ‘scientific research.’ (All 985? Really?!)
The artful description is to get round international law as the moratorium on
commercial whaling does not cover slaughter for scientific reasons. But in truth,
it’s a flagrant two-fingers up to the world by the Japanese goverment, who
know that everyone else is too gutless to make a meal of it – unlike them
as nearly all of their research killings end up inside the belly of a Japanese
diner.
And it’s no painless party for the endangered whales before
they end up as lunch either - in a foreword to a recent Whalewatch report, Sir
David Attenborough says that, “there is no humane way to kill a whale at
sea.” Whalewatch found that in 60% of cases Japanese whalers did not kill
their prey outright and it sometimes took up to two hours for the animals to die.
The United Nations World Charter for Nature gives authority to individuals
to act on behalf of and enforce international conservation laws. You can find
out more about the campaign to stop whaling at www.whalewatch.org and keep apace
with the actions against it at www.seashepherd.org
CHIP
OFF THE OLD CELLBLOCK
The Ministry of Justice (sic) has started
the new year with plans to place tiny microchips under the skin of thousands of
offenders in an attempt to free up more prison places. As Neo Labour continues
to lock up more and more people, not even the new super prisons that will expand
capacity beyond 100,000 (see SchNEWS 614) are going
to be enough - so more ex-prisoners and people the government would otherwise
want safely out of the way are going to have to spend their time banged up at
their own, rather than Her Majesty’s, pleasure.
Electronic tagging
of offenders is nothing new, but these proposals will help a booming prisons industry
monitor and track people anywhere in the world using satellite tracking technology.
The same sort of RFID chips (see SchNEWS 415) used for
pets and livestock are proposed – well, if its good enough for cattle, its
good enough for the socially undesirable... The move was originally proposed by
President of the Association of Chief Police Officers, Ken Jones, and is now getting
government backing. A ‘senior Ministry official’ said, “We have
looked at it, and gone back to it, and worried about the practicalities and the
ethics...but [we thought hey, screw all that ! -] when you look at the challenges
facing the criminal justice system, it’s time has come.”
Those
challenges he referred to are the problem of locking up so many more people, faster
than they can build more prisons (privatised, preferably of course). This supply
and demand problem meant that the number of prisoners held in police cells rose
astonishingly last year - police stations held offenders more than 60,000 times
in 2007 - up from a mere 4,617 in 2006!
17,000 people – including
those on bail, could be micro chipped under the plans, although not all parts
of the incarceration machine think it’s such a great idea.
Harry
Fletcher, assistant general secretary of the National Association of Probation
Officers, said the proposal would not help but merely degrade their ‘clients’.
He added, “...tagging people in the same way we tag our pets cannot be the
way ahead. Treating people like pieces of meat does not seem to represent an improvement
in the system to me.”
But it all sounds like such a nice little
earner for some RFID company or other (and for any non-exec MPs / lobbyists it
pays, too!) One such company is already planning to develop implants that could
transmit electronic shocks, broadcast messages and even act as a microphone, listening
in on conversations. “Some folks might foolishly discount all of these downsides
and futuristic nightmares since the tagging is proposed for criminals like rapists
and murderers,” says privacy expert Liz McIntyre, “But the rest of
us could be next...”
SchNEWS
SUNDAY LUNCH
17th Feb, from 2pm at the Cowley Club, 12
London Rd, Brighton
Come and get fed with lasagne & chips & salad
for under a fiver - and from 6 (ish!) see screenings of new TAKE THREE SchMOVIES
and REEL NEWS...
...AND
FINALLY...
Scoop! Evening Standard (ES) journos have been busy
trawling the web and have found out that Class War activists want to disrupt a
police march! The demo, planned for 23rd January (see SchNEWS
615) expects to attract up to 15,000 coppers dismayed that their 2.5% pay
increase won’t be backdated a few months. ES reckons that riot police will
have to be deployed, fearing that anarchists plan to ‘hijack the march’.
Quite how our mohicanned friends plan to blend in with the thin blue picket line
isn’t revealed - perhaps by griping about paperwork, canteen food and ‘the
chief super’. SchNEWS is looking forward to estimates from the Met of numbers
attending – possibly a little more upbeat of than their usual claim of a
couple of dozen and a clown.
Regardless of whether the pay offer is decent
or not more resources than ever are pouring into the police force despite an alleged
40% reduction in crime. Local police forces get a fifth of all the council tax
paid in the UK, up 7% from 1997. Neo Labour spent £11billion on the police
in 2003/04 – three times more than they did on you Dole scum! Priorities,
priorities...
And tax payers are not the only ones coughing up the cash
for coppers. Figures recently revealed show that the Proceeds From Crime Act 2003
- an incentive scheme whereby police and recovery agencies get to keep half of
whatever they can sieze from ‘criminals’ – is also raking it
in. £15 million is due to be shared out amongst various law enforcers for
assets seized between July and September last year. Still, we’re sure that
impartial, lawful evidence gathering and fair trials won’t be affected merely
because police, CPS prosecutors, customs and the like are all on the performance-payroll!
As a police spokesman declared, the idea is to send out a clear “message
to criminals that crime does not pay.” He didn’t, however, comment
on whether being a policeman pays...
Disclaimer
SchNEWS
warns all readers - you'll just have to wait for your internment like everyone
else...Honest!
SchMOVIES
Download free short films
produced by SchNEWS, or order a copy of 'V For Video Activist, the SchMOVIES
2006 DVD Collection only £6 incl. p&p. Click
here for more info
SchNEWS
Annuals
SCHNEWS
AT TEN - A Decade of Party & Protest - £5 inc p&p (within
UK)
Peace de Resistance
- issues 351-401. £5 inc p&p
SchNEWS
of the World - issues 300 - 250. £4 inc p&p.
SchNEWS
and SQUALLs YEARBOOK 2001. £4 inc p&p.
The
SchQUALL book Sold out - Sorry
SchNEWS
Survival Guide Sold out - Sorry
SchNEWS
Annual issues Sold out - Sorry
(US
Postage £6.00 for individual books, £13 for above offer).
In addition to 50 issues of SchNEWS, each book contains articles, photos,
cartoons, subverts, a yellow pages list of contacts, comedy etc.
Subscribe to SchNEWS:
Send 1st Class stamps (e.g. 10 for next 9 issues) or donations (payable to Justice?).
Or £15 for a year's subscription, or the SchNEWS supporter's rate, £1
a week. Ask for "originals" if you plan to copy and distribute. SchNEWS
is post-free to prisoners.