About Us
Back Issues
The free weekly direct action newsheet published in Brighton since 1994 - Copyleft - Information for Action


It took three days and a huge security operation to evict the last of the three camps on the route of the Bexhill bypass this week. The eviction had been delayed by over a week because of the snow. Campers used the extra time to build more defences including a tunnel, barricades and more nets in the trees. Everything pointed toward the eviction starting on Monday so Sunday saw hordes of people arrive from all round the country. This included the Chief Executives of Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, the Wildlife Trust and the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England. Around 40 people stayed (none of the Chief Executives alas) overnight to greet the Shergroup bailiffs in the morning.

The bailiffs did indeed arrive on Monday and spent the whole day at ground level. They set up fencing, cleared protestors from the site and then had to cut five people out of lock-ons, as well as investigate and fill in the flooded tunnel.

The weather got really wet and windy overnight. Some of the people in the trees had no shelter. The weather didn't improve in the morning so some people were pretty glad the climbing bailiffs started evicting nets, walkways and the concrete lock-ons in treehouses. Quite few people agreed to be taken down, which meant they weren't arrested even though it took just as long for the climbers. At the end of the day, there were still two treehouses and 5 protestors left for another night. Supporters tried to deliver food, water and blankets but the bailiffs were employing siege tactics and refused to allow any assistance in at all. Protesters had to suffer the cold conditions with limited supplies. Some supplies managed to get through eventually but more because of the general overweightness and age of the security guards rather than their goodwill and kindness.

On Wednesday, the climbers had another lock-on to deal with before they could get to someone hanging from a rope between the tops of two trees and some others climbing high in the trees. At about 1pm the last protestor was evicted and then the chainsaws moved in immediately to fell all the trees, including 200 year old oaks.

One of the tree dwellers told Schnews: 'This eviction, along with all the other resistance, has really shown what strong opposition there is to this road, and increased the cost of buliding it. The passion and determination of so many people made this a long and expensive eviction of a very small area. It's gutting to see this woodland destroyed but the campaign has plenty more energy and ideas yet.'

Another protestor said 'More roads mean more road protests!'

This battle may have been lost but the war has only just begun...

There is 1 comment on this story...
Added By: Wong - 27th February 2013 @ 7:57 AM
A notice to quit from any one teannt will end the tenancy unilaterally, won't it? (and after 2 Aug 2011 it will be just a periodic tenancy). Thereafter (once the NTQ, has worked its magic and ended the tenancy), if a new tenancy were to be granted to just Monika and her partner why can they not not just commence possession proceedings to evict their unwelcome houseguest?. Of course, the landlord could commence possession proceedings to recover the property after an effective teannt's NTQ and I'm not entirely convinced that he needs to have all his former teannts as defendants or that he must evict everyone (notwithstanding that the possession order is effective against anyone found in the property). But surely the landlord would want Monika and her partner to pay the legal costs, etc up front if he was litigating for their benefit?Of course, Monika's sister might want to be rehoused by the council and they won't be looking to do anything for her unless and until she can show them a possession order. And indeed there's a chance that she might be found to be intentionally homeless if her own actions have resulted in Monika and her partner no longer being willing to live with her anymore, albeit the council might not pursue the enquiries that deeply.I did have a case many years ago where a homelessness applicant had presented to the council and when the council asked the landlord why he had sought possession, the landlord replied he asked me to and he even paid the costs up front'. Somehow, I don't think that the applicant expected his landlord to be quite so candid!
Stories about similar subjects...

The main camp at Bexhill took to the trees and tunnels as bailiffs and police arrived on mass this Wednesday (16th).

Animal rights campaigner is attacked outside KFC outlet during a protest

Bexhill Bypass Update from a Combe Haven defender

The real battle of Bexhill begins as activists and contractors face off over tree felling near Adam's Farm.

One group of Spanish workers has come together to stick a spanner in the works of austerity misery. Or more specifically, in the locks.

Derail the first and the worst of the new road schemes for the UK.

Anti-nuclear protesters fined for obstructing the highway outside Hinkley Nuclear power plant.

Environmental activist is released after seven years imprisonment.

Twitter: @SchNEWS